Which of the following is true about restrictive covenants?

Restrictive covenants refer to specific provisions in property deeds that impose limitations on how a property can be used or developed. They are designed to maintain a certain standard within a community or to protect the values of surrounding properties. Such covenants may dictate various restrictions, such as prohibiting certain types of construction, requiring specific architectural styles, or limiting the use of land for particular purposes.

The choice indicating that restrictive covenants limit certain uses of the property as dictated in the deed accurately reflects the essence of what these covenants are meant to do. They are enforceable if they are clearly stated in the deed and do not violate public policy, and they serve the purpose of protecting the integrity of a neighborhood or community by ensuring adherence to predetermined standards.

The other options do not accurately represent the nature or implications of restrictive covenants. While they may sometimes be unenforceable under specific circumstances (as mentioned in a different choice), that does not universally apply to all restrictive covenants. The notion that they promote unrestricted property development contradicts their primary function, which is to impose limitations rather than to encourage freedom in property use. Lastly, the assertion that only government entities can enact them is incorrect, as private individuals or associations can also create and enforce restrictive covenants.